Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Module 7 Group Project

Module 7 Group Project

Q Your group completed most of the material for your Pitchbook Presentation in prior modules-- this final step brings it all together to complete the story you are trying to sell. Remember to incorporate feedback received on your M4, M5, and M6 deliverables. Your video should be no longer than 15 minutes. Remember, each member of your team must have a speaking part in the presentation. Please consult the Pitchbook Presentation Assignment Document for detailed information and the grading rubric for this assignment. When submitting your group's Pitchbook Presentation, please make sure to submit the following items: 1. 1. Your embedded presentation video. Please consult Course Documents for instructions on uploading your video to YouTube. 2. A file containing your PowerPoint Slide Deck and/or any other visual aids used in the presentation. 3. An Excel file of your evaluations used in your analysis. For detailed information on uploaded these three items using the "Text Entry" option in the submission link, please review the video in the announcements provided for the Sun Case. Rubric Pitchbook Presentation Pitchbook Presentation Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrength of Opening - Speaker captures the attention of the audience at the beginning of the presentation. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Speech - No “ums”, appearance of extemporaneous speech, speak to the audience as opposed to reading a script. 10 pts Superior 8 pts High Quality 7 pts Average 6 pts Below Average 5 pts Poor 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRole Play Element - Remain in role play entire presentation 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppearance - Professional dress, effective lighting, use of a backdrop or background. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism - No zoom errors, no pauses in recording, smooth flow of presentation, logical presentation of ideas and recommendations 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePassion - Presentation exhibits confidence in work, confidence in recommendation 10 pts Superior 8 pts High Quality 7 pts Average 6 pts Below Average 5 pts Poor 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo Box Effectiveness - Video box in Zoom does not block material on slides when presenting, speaker’s presence is clear, audio is clear and understandable 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides - professional quality, no errors, no misspellings, no grammar mistakes. Slides are appropriate for the audience and the presentation format. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Creativity 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrength of Closing -Strong closing like a gymnastics routine -- you can execute on everything but if you don’t stick the landing, you don’t win the gold 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQualitative Justification of the Deal 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCost of Capital - Numbers are complete and correct 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValuation - Income Approach - Numbers are complete and correct. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValuation - Market Approach - Numbers are complete and correct. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValuation Summary - Numbers are complete and correct. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCombination Analysis - Numbers are complete and correct. 20 pts Superior 17 pts High Quality 15 pts Average 13 pts Below Average 11 pts Poor 20 pts Total Points: 300 PreviousNext

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

? Leverage of existing distribution ? Trend of at home testing kits increase since 2020 ? Delivery of prescriptions ? Quest Diagnostics is looking to go to retail with testing kits ? Target has a trusted health section in stores ? Target has the opportunity to expand Quest’s at home testing kits to more consumer demanded kits ? Ability to leverage existing R&D of Quest for new types of home testing kits ? Examples include pregnancy, diabetes, STD, drug abuse kits ? Expansion of both product offering and customer base for Target - Preliminary Valuation - 5-Year DCF based on normal growth - Income Approach Valuation - 10-Year DCF based on assumptions - Valuations including different levels of Synergy - 25% Level, Low LTGR, Decrease in EBIT Growth - 50% Level, Normal Levels - 75% Level, High LTGR, Increase in EBIT Growth - Market Approach - Based on Comparable Company Data